September 4th, 2010 By Categories: Education, News, Security

CENTRAL FALLS, R.I. – Teachers who were fired and ultimately rehired in a dispute that focused national debate over education reform have returned to their Rhode Island classrooms amid hopes that changes they agreed to will help improve student performance at their persistently troubled high school.

The changes at Central Falls High School — where just 7 percent of 11th graders tested last year were proficient in math — include a longer school day, more rigorous teacher evaluations and flexible schedules to provide more classes for struggling students. Teachers were also required to participate in more days of professional development.

Education Commissioner Deborah Gist acknowledged the obstacles facing students in Rhode Island’s smallest and poorest city.

“They’re movable,” Gist said. “We can push past them, we can climb over them, we can climb under them.”

Before school started on Wednesday, juniors attended a math “boot camp” to help them prepare for October’s tests and school leaders visited the homes of incoming freshmen. The administration is also reaching out to recent dropouts and others who have been out of school, said Superintendent Fran Gallo.

“We want children back, and we’ll find paths for them, multiple pathways, whatever it might take to work for our students, we’re committed to,” Gallo said. “I think that kind of public commitment has never been clearly defined, clearly hasn’t been put out there in a transparent way.”

Several students this week said the mass firings were unnecessary and that teachers were unfairly scapegoated for problems beyond their control. Central Falls, a cramped city just a square mile in size, has budget problems so severe that this summer it was placed under the supervision of a state-appointed receiver.

More children live in poverty in Central Falls than anywhere else in Rhode Island. Just under half of the city’s residents identify as Hispanic, and many say they do not speak English at home.

“Some kids want to come here and actually go to school and work and everything,” said junior Angela Collazo, 16. “But some kids don’t.” She added that students would have benefited more from extra tutoring than having new teachers.

The firings last February came after the state identified the high school as one of Rhode Island’s worst and ordered improvements. When reforms talks between Gallo and the teachers’ union broke down, the entire staff was issued termination notices — one of four reform options outlined in federal guidelines.

Under that model, no more than half the teachers could be rehired.

Teachers and students protested the firings, though the plan was applauded by U.S. Education Secretary Arne Duncan. President Barack Obama, in a March education speech, singled out Central Falls as an example of accountability for poor performance.

“If a school continues to fail its students year after year after year, if it doesn’t show any sign of improvement, then there’s got to be a sense of accountability,” Obama said. “And that’s what happened in Rhode Island last week.”

The teachers got their jobs back in May after agreeing to similar terms they had previously resisted.

There’s plenty of work to be done, both to raise performance and soothe lingering bruised feelings.

Though the union and administration struck a unified tone in announcing the new agreement, many teachers remain apprehensive and need to rebuild trust lost during the acrimonious dispute, said Jane Sessums, president of the local teachers’ union. Fewer than 10 decided not to return.

“Partly it’s the way they were treated and everything that happened last year,” Sessums said of the overall mood of the teachers. “Their job security, that trust factor, that’s really important in any teacher-administrator relationship. I don’t know if they felt as if there was a lot of collaborating going forward up to this point.”

Susan Vollucci, a visual arts teacher, said she is hopeful the changes would lead to progress, but said time will tell.

“If we could keep the kids for four years, from 9th grade to 12th grade, they would all pass the test. We don’t,” Vollucci said. “They come here, then they go to the Dominican Republic, they go to Woonsocket, they go to Providence, and they bounce around, so we can never gather the skills on a consistent year-to-year basis.”

Richard Kinslow, an English teacher at Central Falls for 21 years, said the entire episode was unsettling. He said he felt insulted and embarrassed by the negative attention, lampooned in the media and fodder for critical blogs.

But he proudly shows off a recent postcard from a student who graduated a decade ago as a reminder of the good work he believes he does.

“It was hurtful,” Kinslow said, “but it’s time to move on.”

Follow Yahoo! News on , become a fan on

Fired, rehired teachers back at troubled RI school (AP)

Fired, rehired teachers back at troubled RI school (AP)

September 4th, 2010 By Categories: Education, Laws, News, Tech

A school district in South Hadley, Massachusetts, is hoping a specialized software application will help stop tragedies like the one that befell Phoebe Prince, an Irish-born teen who committed suicide in January after an alleged bullying campaign by fellow students.

In the wake of her death, the Massachusetts state legislature passed a law mandating that schools create formal anti-bullying plans, as well as provide an anonymous way of reporting bullying incidents.

The law inspired South Hadley native Edward Wall to develop a software application that allows observers of suspected bullying to make online reports to school administrators, anonymously if desired.

“It seemed like something like this was needed,” said Wall, who is himself a graduate of the high school. His company, Earshot Technologies, is donating the software to the school but he hopes to market it to others.

When a report of bullying, victimization or suspected illegal activity is made, the system alerts school administrators by a text message and e-mail. If the administrator deems the report valid, it can be “activated” for a fixed time frame, such as one week.

Active reports show up on dashboards provided to other lower-level officials, such as teachers or coaches, who have significant interactions with the student in question. These officials must closely observe the student and submit a report once the observation period ends. Those reports are included in a master file along with the original complaint.

The system is getting some finishing touches and should be operational at the high school by October, said principal Dan Smith.

At a minimum, all the parties involved will be called in for an initial discussion of the report, Smith said.

“There will never be a complaint that comes in where we don’t do at least that much,” he said. That initial meeting will determine whether a full investigation is warranted.

After some discussions, the school has decided not to allow anonymous reports to be filed online, at least for now, he said. A paper-based anonymous reporting system is in place “to meet the intent of the law,” he said.

School officials are concerned that people in other locations, looking to cause mischief, could obtain the names of students and use the Earshot system to file false reports, he said. “We would end up chasing our tails on things like that.”

Overall, such systems pose challenges for schools along with any benefits, said Eric Goldman, an associate professor at the Santa Clara University School of Law and director of its High Tech Law Institute.

For one, schools must be prepared to supply the labor power to deal with all reports, or else face potential liabilities if they do not, he said. “If you ask, then you better be prepared to respond.”

But bullying investigations are thorny issues overall, he added. For example, the accused could turn out to be innocent and subsequently claim their civil rights had been violated.

“The decision of the principal to act or not to act is fraught with liability in either direction,” Goldman said.

It remains to be seen how much use the Earshot system will get. The Prince tragedy has seemed to have a chilling effect on would-be bullies at the school, where classes resumed this week, according to Smith.

“We’ve gotten off to a very respectful and proper start,” he said.

Chris Kanaracus covers enterprise software and general technology breaking news for The IDG News Service. Chris’s e-mail address is Chris_Kanaracus@idg.com

Follow Yahoo! News on , become a fan on

School Uses Anti-bullying App After Suicide (PC World)

School Uses Anti-bullying App After Suicide (PC World)

September 3rd, 2010 By Categories: Education, Laws, News, Security

SAN JUAN, Texas – When Ruth Garcia’s twins are born in two months, they’ll have all the rights of U.S. citizens. They and their six brothers and sisters will be able to vote, apply for federal student loans and even run for president.

Garcia is an illegal immigrant who crossed into the country about 14 years ago, and the citizenship granted to her children and millions others like them is at the center of a divisive national debate.

Republicans are pushing for congressional hearings to consider changing the nation’s 14th Amendment to deny such children the automatic citizenship the Constitution guarantees. They say women like Garcia are taking advantage of a constitutional amendment meant to guarantee the rights of freed slaves, and paint a picture of pregnant women rushing across the border to give birth.

A closer examination of the issue shows that the trend is not as dramatic as some immigration opponents have claimed.

Most illegal immigrants are born to parents like Garcia who have made the United States their home for years.

Out of 340,000 babies born to illegal immigrants in the United States in 2008, 85 percent of the parents had been in the country for more than a year, and more than half for at least five years, according to recent study from the Pew Hispanic Center.

And immigration experts say it’s extraordinarily rare for immigrants to come to the U.S. just so they can have babies and get citizenship. In most cases, they come to the U.S. for economic reasons and better hospitals, and end up staying and raising families.

Garcia crossed into the U.S. illegally about 14 years ago, before her children were born, and her husband has since been deported. She earns a living by selling tamales to other immigrants who live in fear of being deported from the slapdash, impoverished colonias that dot the Texas-Mexico border.

“I think that children aren’t at fault for having been born here,” Garcia said. “My children always have lived here. They’ve never gone to another country.”

Under current immigration law, Garcia and others like her don’t get U.S. citizenship even though their children are Americans.

With an estimated 11.1 million illegal immigrants living in the United States, the issue strikes a chord with many voters — people like retired Air Force nurse and pediatric nurse practitioner Susan Struck, 66, of Double Adobe, Ariz.

“People come over … and they have babies with U.S. birth certificates, then they go back over the border with that Social Security number, with that birth certificate,” and have access to public services, she said at a recent event near the border organized by conservative tea party activists.

Several prominent Republican leaders share Struck’s beliefs on the issue. Sen. Lindsay Graham of South Carolina has been a vocal advocate for changing the Constitution, and he helped the issue gain momentum heading into the midterm elections.

“Women have traveled from across the world for the purpose of adding a U.S. passport holder to their family, as far away as China, Turkey and as close as Mexico,” said Jon Feere, legal analyst for the Center for Immigration Studies, which advocates for strict immigration laws.

Still, changing the Constitution is highly unlikely, legal scholars say. Measures have been introduced in each two-year congressional session since 2005, but none has made it out of committee. Constitutional changes require approval by two-thirds majorities in both chambers of Congress, an impossibility now because Democrats have the majority in both houses and most oppose such a measure. Even if that changes after November and legislation is passed, an amendment would still need to be ratified by three-fourths of the states.

To be sure, some pregnant Mexican women do come to the United States. In border cities like Nogales, women have been coming to the U.S. for decades to give birth, although the primary reason is better medical care, Santa Cruz County sheriff Tony Estrada said. Billboards advertising birthing services in Arizona line streets across the border in Nogales, Mexico.

Tucson Medical Center, 115 miles southeast of Phoenix, offers packages designed to provide inclusive care to new mothers. The program draws some residents of the northern Mexican state of Sonora who can afford its upfront costs and already have U.S. visas, spokesman Michael Letson said.

Princeton University demographer Douglas Massey said in 30 years studying Mexican immigration, he’s never interviewed a migrant who said they came to the United States just to get citizenship for their children.

“Mexicans do not come to have babies in the United States,” said Massey, who blames the tightening of the border in the 1990s for cutting off normal migration of men who used to come to work for a year or two and then go home. “They end up having babies in the United States because men can no longer circulate freely back and forth from homes in Mexico to jobs in the United States and husbands and wives quite understandably want to be together.”

More common, he and other experts says, are a families stuck with one child who is legal and others who aren’t — like Beatriz Gomez, a 35-year-old illegal immigrant who came to Phoenix 11 years ago on a now-expired tourist visa from Arriaga in the Mexican state of Chiapas.

Her 12-year-old daughter was born in Mexico and is here illegally, but her two youngest children, ages 8 and 5, were born in the U.S. and are citizens.

“It’s sad,” Gomez said of her oldest daughter, who was only 1 when the family came to the United States. “She studies hard, and she won’t be able to go to a university like the other two.”

___

Associated Press Writers Amanda Lee Myers in Phoenix, Jonathan J. Cooper in Hereford, Ariz., and Paul J. Weber in San Juan contributed to this report.

Follow Yahoo! News on , become a fan on

‘Birth tourism’ a tiny portion of immigrant babies (AP)

‘Birth tourism’ a tiny portion of immigrant babies (AP)

September 3rd, 2010 By Categories: Education, Florida, News, Tech

Standardized exams — the multiple-choice, bubble tests in math and reading that have played a growing role in American public education in recent years — are being overhauled.

Over the next four years, two groups of states, 44 in all, will get $330 million to work with hundreds of university professors and testing experts to design a series of new assessments that officials say will look very different from those in use today.

The new tests, which Secretary of Education Arne Duncan described in a speech in Virginia on Thursday, are to be ready for the 2014-15 school year.

They will be computer-based, Mr. Duncan said, and will measure higher-order skills ignored by the multiple-choice exams used in nearly every state, including students’ ability to read complex texts, synthesize information and do research projects.

“The use of smarter technology in assessments,” Mr. Duncan said, “makes it possible to assess students by asking them to design products of experiments, to manipulate parameters, run tests and record data.”

Because the new tests will be computerized and will be administered several times throughout the school year, they are expected to provide faster feedback to teachers than the current tests about what students are learning and what might need to be retaught.

“If these plans work out, it’ll turn the current testing system upside down,” said Bruce Fuller, an education professor at Berkeley.

The tests are being redesigned to assess the common academic standards in English and math that nearly 40 states have adopted in recent months.

One group, led by Florida, will be made up of 25 states and the District of Columbia. Among its members are several large states like California, Illinois and New York. Known as the Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers, the group was awarded $170 million.

The other group, whose membership overlaps the first, has 31 states and is led by Washington. It includes other Western states like Hawaii, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, Oregon and Utah, as well as some in the East, like Maine, New Hampshire and Vermont. The group, which won $160 million, calls itself the Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium.

Twelve of the 44 states, including Colorado, New Jersey, Pennsylvania and Ohio, are participating in both groups but are expected eventually to choose one set of tests.

The two groups are supposed to work in a friendly competition, though their plans are “strikingly similar,” said Elena Silva, a senior policy analyst at Education Sector, a Washington research group, who has studied their proposals.

Both groups will produce tests that rely heavily on technology in their classroom administration and in their scoring, she noted.

Both will provide not only end-of-year tests similar to those in use now but also formative tests that teachers will administer several times a year to help guide instruction, she said.

And both groups’ tests will include so-called performance-based tasks, designed to mirror complex, real-world situations.

In performance-based tasks, which are increasingly common in tests administered by the military and in other fields, students are given a problem — they could be told, for example, to pretend they are a mayor who needs to reduce a city’s pollution — and must sift through a portfolio of tools and write analytically about how they would use them to solve the problem.

The new tests could be useful to teachers by giving them information on what their students are learning, but it might also require some mid-course adjustments, several experts said.

Over the past decade, the federal No Child Left Behind law has emphasized helping low-achieving students improve their basic reading and math, encouraging states to produce tests that have measured relatively low-level skills.

Although the Bush-era law is still on the books, two years of Obama administration policy have been leading the public schools in new directions.

The new academic standards adopted by a majority of the states, with the administration’s encouragement, already will require teachers to rewrite many of their lessons. The new tests, which in theory will immediately identify for teachers the concepts students have not yet learned, will require teachers to adapt classroom instruction to make use of the testing results.

“This could be one of the greatest challenges our teaching force has ever faced, to teach the new concepts embedded in the English and math standards, and to adapt to these new tests,” said Mark Schneider, a vice president at the American Institutes for Research and a former commissioner of the arm of the Education Department that oversees federal testing.

Mr. Duncan set aside $350 million from the billions that Congress voted last year for the Race to the Top grant competition to finance the testing initiative. The department has not yet said what it will do with the $20 million not awarded to either group of states.

U.S. Asks Educators to Reinvent Student Tests, and How They Are Given

September 3rd, 2010 By Categories: Education, News

James Warren is a columnist for the Chicago News Cooperative.

Chicago News Cooperative

A nonprofit, nonpartisan news organization providing local coverage of Chicago and the surrounding area for The New York Times.

More From the Chicago News Cooperative »

Congressional hearings tend to be orchestrated blends of theater and policy: heavy on anecdote, light on insight, rife with both the posturing of politicians and the faux contrition of well-rehearsed witnesses caught in a televised bull’s-eye.

There was some of that, but luckily a bit more, when Senator Richard J. Durbin served as both host and de facto prosecutor on Tuesday at a Chicago forum on our for-profit colleges.

As a former Big Ten president said to me, “The for-profits have kicked our butts,” meaning those of the nonprofit higher-education sector are slow to change and are rarely analyzed for efficiency, productivity or quality. The likes of the University of Phoenix, with 450,000 students, have adapted better to change via online offerings and scheduling flexibility.

The Career Education Corporation and DeVry Inc., both based in the Chicago area, are among those that flourish, generating 90 percent of their revenue from their students’ Pell grants and federal loans. In 10 years, federal aid to for-profits has soared to $26.5 billion from just under $5 billion.

Scrutiny by the Department of Education and Congress is inspired by the for-profits’ huge sums, a seemingly ideologically based suspicion of tidy profits, and obvious misdeeds. The latter include deceptive recruiting, low graduation rates and some attendees’ winding up with mountainous debt in a sector accounting for just 10 percent of post-secondary students, but 25 percent of all Pell grants and 44 percent of student loan defaults.

Mr. Durbin, the Illinois Democrat, recalled confronting $8,900 of debt after law school in 1969. It’s a quaintly modest figure compared with what two 20-something students at the hearing face. One for-profit graduate said she owed $86,000 after getting a degree in criminal justice not recognized by prospective employers like the Chicago Police Department.

Such “federally subsidized rip-offs,” as Mr. Durbin put it, were a theme as he confronted top officials of industry leaders DeVry, Kaplan University and Career Education.

Some of the back-and-forth was enlightening, inspiring admissions of error and a need to hold for-profits to the same accreditation scrutiny as nonprofits. I was reminded why Senate Democrats would be better off with the No. 2-ranking Mr. Durbin as their leader rather than the somnolent Senator Harry Reid of Nevada. Mr. Durbin is a tougher, smarter advocate.

But his two-hour forum couldn’t possibly explore all of the subject’s knotty complexities.

What about the likes of Chicago State University, whose abysmal graduation rates are lower than those at many for-profits? Where’s the accountability in a public nonprofit sector whose receipt of federal, state and county tax dollars far exceeds the federal dollars going to for-profits?

What value should we place on access to post-secondary education for poor and minority students? If it’s a lot, then don’t be shocked by lower graduation rates and higher loan-default rates.

And if you talk the talk about opportunity for all, while state and community colleges are hit hard by budget cuts, don’t reflexively demonize the private sector. Or let students and parents off the hook for a gross lack of due diligence about the value of a for-profit education degree, akin as they are to many subprime mortgage borrowers.

And why insist that only the for-profits show — as is tentatively proposed — that they have prepared graduates for “gainful employment” and that their graduates have a certain debt-to-earnings ratio?

What about nonprofits like Harvard Medical School, with its many debt-saddled graduates? Mr. Durbin touched slightly, if not convincingly, on this hypothetical, while conceding that community colleges — but apparently not other higher-education nonprofits — should be held to a “gainful employment” standard.

Given community colleges’ lobbying clout, the Cubs will win the World Series before that happens.

Of course, we might spend a bit less time on for-profits’ aspiring sous-chefs with pricey for-profit culinary degrees than on the frequent disaster of early, elementary and secondary education.

After all, the senator did hear that 90 percent of Chicago Public Schools graduates who enter community colleges can’t do college-level math or English. It’s good to be outraged over students saddled with debt. But we might focus first on those handicapped by shameful ignorance.

Chicago News Cooperative: Despite Scrutiny of For-Profits, Crucial Questions Are Unanswered

September 2nd, 2010 By Categories: News

Here is another opportunity to express your individuality or PC Pro School brand. Every school has to advertise to succeed, but it is a minefield out there. Unless you have a six figure budget, you have to be very careful about how you go about marketing yourself or your company.

The branded promotional products market is one that has been around for years. You can get anything you can possibly think of made in your business logo or brand. Everything from golf tees, cars, towels to phones and pens, and everything in between. The choice of what material to go for can be a daunting one considering the range, but it doesn’t have to be so difficult.

Choosing an item should consider the company it represents. You will find institutions like banks will offer good quality pens or golf tees which are serious but useful items for their kind of valued clientele. Whereas a design studio might offer a crayon set or specially design mug coaster or mouse mat to appeal to their clients. Each offering carefully directed to where it will do the most good, or cause the least offense.

Having custom note-pads is a good middle ground for an office based business. Whether you intend on using them internally or giving them out to clients or contacts, they are a useful way of marketing your organization. A small logo or letterhead at the top with contact details underneath, will ensure that the note-pad is used.

Adding green credentials like using recycled paper, or paper from FSC (Forestry Stewardship Council) will add an extra dimension to the brand and show consideration, and environmental awareness, which all companies want to be associated with.

The worst thing you can do is waste valuable money and resources on corporate braded items that don’t have the desired effect. Not everyone wants a golf umbrella or uses mouse mats. Consider the items carefully before making a choice and spending your money. A note-pad is neutral enough and useful enough that it’s bound to be used in the vast majority of situations. It is also market neutral, in that it doesn’t only relate to a particular field or type of client. Everybody uses paper for one reason or another and it bound to have a need for more. Choosing custom note-pads to advertise your company is one of the most effective promotional goods you can get.

It isn’t all about business though. Taking your own themed stationery to school or college is a sure way to set yourself apart from the rest. Having family headed note-pads around the house adds that little bit of class to things. Using them as shopping lists, or telephone scratch pads are just two of the many uses they can be put to.

Whatever your needs, let ThoughtMechanics provide you the ultimate is personal service. We will print your note-pads with whatever logo, text or design you need and have them to you as quick as possible.

Express yourself with PC Pro Schools.

PC Pro School

September 2nd, 2010 By Categories: Education, News
Hoping to portray themselves as more affordable and all-around better neighbors, private colleges from Appalachia to Boston are sweetening financial aid packages for students from their own backyards.

The latest and most prestigious example is Northwestern University. By targeting local students in financial need, Northwestern is seeking to boost minority enrollment, strengthen local ties and stay competitive in the college admissions race at a time when many private schools are increasing aid based on student merit instead of financial circumstances.

“You may be thinking globally about your education curriculum,” David Warren, president of the National Association of Independent Colleges and Universities, said of such efforts. “But you’re increasingly acting locally with respect to students.”

Northwestern’s “Good Neighbor, Great University” scholarships will be awarded starting in fall 2011 to about 100 incoming freshman who graduated from high schools in Evanston, Ill., home to Northwestern’s main campus, and Chicago, site of its medical school. About 2,000 first-year students enroll at Northwestern annually.

Students whose families show financial need — there is no income cut-off — will be eligible for scholarships replacing loans and payments from work-study. The majority of students who qualify will receive enough aid to fully cover the cost of Northwestern’s $40,223 annual tuition and fees, said Michael Mills, associate provost for university enrollment.

The program was recommended by a university task force on diversity and inclusion, which was formed following racial tensions on campus, including a controversy last fall over two students who dressed up in blackface for Halloween.

After its black student enrollment peaked at nearly 10% during the Carter administration, Northwestern experienced a slow and steady decline, Mills said.

This year’s incoming freshman class is about 7.2% black, up from 4.5% three years ago, which Mills attributed in part to better outreach to Chicago Public Schools and waiving the $65 application fee for its students. The university expects to enroll 60 CPS graduates in this fall’s freshman class, up from 28 in fall 2008.

Turning again to Chicago for the new scholarship program seemed a logical step considering the city’s racial diversity and the strong Chicago connections of faculty and board members, he said.

Joshua Williams, 22, a 2010 Northwestern graduate who graduated from high school on Chicago’s South Side, sought Northwestern out rather than being courted. A debater and poet who was raised by his grandmother, Williams settled on Northwestern as a high-school sophomore, attended a summer debate camp there and won financial aid to cover tuition.

“Now we see a Northwestern that has a new face, that is more proactive, reaching out to public schools,” said Williams, who is African-American and served on the diversity task force.

In developing the new scholarship program, Mills said Northwestern also was searching for answers after watching too many accepted students take merit-based scholarships at comparable and lesser schools.

“You’ve got all the evidence in the world to show kids you’ve recruited are smart enough to get admitted and predisposed to attend Northwestern, then you watch them sort of get plucked away,” he said.

The program should help local families that traditionally have earned too much to get a free ride and too little to afford Northwestern, said Patrick Tassoni, college coordinator at Chicago’s Northside Preparatory High School.

“Many colleges are saying, ‘You’re accepted, please send your $20,000 check to …’” Tassoni said of the plight of middle-income families. “That’s when families really start to compare the different financial aid packages at schools. Maybe now, more moderate-income families will be less apprehensive to apply to Northwestern.”

Among other private colleges that are going local with new or expanded financial aid, some directly tied to students’ financial need and others not:

• Last fall, Davis & Elkins College in rural West Virginia started offering discounted tuition to freshmen from seven nearby counties to make its cost comparable to that of West Virginia University. The small Presbyterian college says it was seeking to both reach enrollment targets and deepen ties to the area, which has low median household incomes and college attendance rates. The freshmen class from those counties grew from 16 in 2009-09 to 87 in 2009-10, and this fall is projected at 122, officials say.

• Also last fall, the University of Evansville began offering up to $18,000 a year, for up to four years, to all high school graduates or permanent residents of Vanderburgh County, Ind., its home county. School officials say their main motivation is to get more students living on campus and fully experiencing college life. Living in campus housing is required.

Boston University in 2008 announced expanded aid to Boston Public School students, replacing loans with grants to eligible students who meet academic targets and do 25 hours of community service per semester. The average family income of recipients is $68,000, said Laurie Pohlm, vice president for enrollment and student affairs. Along with keeping up local relations, Pohlm said BU is seeking a competitive edge for the best students in its primary markets — more important because the number of high school graduates nationally is projected to dip in the next five years.

• In Worcester, Mass., the red brick buildings of the College of Holy Cross literally loom over the city, seemingly out of reach of many working-class residents. So in 2008, the 2,700-student college began offering free tuition to city residents whose families earn less than $50,000 a year — also roughly what it costs to attend Holy Cross each year.

“Our local kids felt, ‘Holy Cross, ooh, that sticker price,’” said Lynne Myers, director of financial aid. “We wanted a clear understanding that we are your neighbor, we’re sitting right here on the hill, and we want to be accessible to you.”

Annie Le, raised by a single mother on disability and welfare, is one of 23 students who have taken the offer.

“I’m the first girl in my family to go to college. My mom didn’t want me to go away, and now she’s just a few minutes away,” said Le, who was also able to keep her job waitressing at a pancake restaurant. “It just made it a lot easier.”

Eric Gorski, a national writer for The Associated Press based in Denver, can be reached at egorski(at)ap.org.

Copyright 2010 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Local students benefit from private colleges’ financial aid

Local students benefit from private colleges’ financial aid

September 2nd, 2010 By Categories: Education, News

Bret D. Schundler, the fired New Jersey education commissioner, charged on Wednesday that Gov. Chris Christie had defamed him and knowingly misstated Mr. Schundler’s role in an episode that cost the state a $400 million federal grant.

Mel Evans/Associated Press

Bret D. Schundler emphatically denied misleading anyone.

A day after Mr. Christie, a Republican, said the moral of the story was “don’t lie to the governor,” Mr. Schundler released a written chronology that emphatically denied misleading anyone, along with documents that he said supported his version of events. The release drew further attention to what has been the most embarrassing stumbles by the seven-month-old Christie administration, and to a sudden public feud between former allies.

Mr. Schundler said this week that he had personally made the clerical error that left New Jersey a few points short for a grant in the federal Race to the Top program.

“I could accept being fired for that,” Mr. Schundler, who was dismissed on Friday, wrote in his account. “But I will not accept being defamed by the governor for something he knows I did not do.

“The governor called me a liar this week. That was the last straw. I have no choice now but to defend my name.”

Mr. Christie said Tuesday that “it’s time now to move on,” but the Democrats, who control the Legislature and who have felt pushed around by the governor, have seized on the administration’s mistakes and finger-pointing, promising to hold hearings that could prolong the damage.

Over a few days, the episode turned into a triple public relations setback for Mr. Christie.

First came the revelation that New Jersey’s application had omitted a simple piece of data — the state’s 2008-9 spending on education — that was required to show a continuing commitment to supporting schools. Including that number would have raised the state’s score enough to win the $400 million it sought.

At a news conference on Aug. 25, Mr. Christie assailed federal officials for not crediting the state for the information, saying Mr. Schundler had given the numbers orally to federal education officials in an interview earlier in the month to review the application. That prompted the second embarrassment, when federal officials released a video recording of the session showing that when asked about the missing data, Mr. Schundler and his staff were unable to come up with it.

The third blow came after the governor fired the commissioner. Mr. Schundler said that he had repeatedly told Mr. Christie and his aides that he had not given the numbers to the federal officials, but that the governor had made that claim anyway to deflect blame onto the Obama administration.

(Mr. Schundler has also emphasized that even if New Jersey officials had produced the data during the interview, orally or in writing, it would not have changed the state’s score, because all information was required to be submitted in June.)

Mr. Schundler contends that at the interview he assured the judges that although he did not have the numbers handy, New Jersey complied with the requirements for education support.

“However, video of the presentation revealed that this was not the case,” Michael Drewniak, the governor’s press secretary, said Wednesday.

“This indisputable fact was the basis for Mr. Schundler’s dismissal, no matter how much he attempts to cloud the issue or redirect responsibility for his own conduct.”

Mr. Schundler said he now believed he made the remark as the session was wrapping up, after the camera had been turned off.

The affair was a stunningly swift fall for Mr. Schundler, 51, who has been a favorite of New Jersey conservatives for two decades. A prominent advocate of charter schools, he was mayor of Jersey City from 1992 to 2001 and twice ran unsuccessfully for governor.

In interviews this week, Mr. Schundler said repeatedly that he was speaking out about the dispute with the governor only because his reputation — and his employment prospects — were at stake. He said he feared that the conflict would impede the governor’s school reform agenda.

In an e-mail he sent to reporters on Wednesday, Mr. Schundler said he would not discuss the dispute beyond his written account. He added, “I am sick of this thing.”

Fired Education Chief Says New Jersey Governor Defamed Him

September 1st, 2010 By Categories: Education, News

SISSETON, S.D. – An 18-year-old high school student stockpiled bomb-making materials in his bedroom and wrote about wanting to blow up his school, target individuals he hated, rape women and “become the world’s most infamous sociopath,” authorities said.

Joseph Thomas Hansen, of Claire City, was arrested Aug. 23 after someone tipped off a police school resource officer that Hansen had talked about an attack, authorities said.

“Thanks to an alert citizen and a school resource officer, they were able to prevent a very serious and potentially dangerous situation,” state Attorney General Marty Jackley said by phone Wednesday.

Hansen pleaded not guilty Tuesday to selling, transporting or possessing an explosive device and possessing substances with the intent to make a destructive device, and is due back in court Sept. 14. If convicted of all charges, he could face up to 25 years in prison, Jackley said.

Hansen remained jailed Wednesday in lieu of $500,000 bond and was unavailable to comment. A man who answered the phone at the family’s home who identified himself as Hansen’s father, Roland Hansen, referred questions to his son’s attorney, Scott Bratland. Bratland did not immediately return phone messages seeking comment.

During a search of Hansen’s room, investigators found a list Hansen wrote of things he wanted to do, including blow up Sisseton High School — where he was set to begin his senior year the day after his arrest — torture and rape women and “become the world’s most infamous sociopath,” according to an affidavit filed Monday.

He listed 39 people he hated and the reasons why, and he researched the 1999 Columbine school massacre in Littleton, Colo., in which two student gunmen killed 12 classmates and a teacher and wounded 26 others before committing suicide, investigators said.

Detectives also found drawings of swastikas, documents outlining two attempts to make napalm, instructional materials on how to make bombs, four guns and a video showing two explosive devices detonating, according to the affidavit.

Two people whose names were redacted in the affidavit told Roberts County Sheriff’s investigators that Hansen told them he “had enough fireworks to blow up Sisseton and that the first day of school would be a short one,” the court documents state.

During an initial interview with police, Hansen said he was fascinated by mass murder, read books on the subject and wanted to know what makes killers tick, authorities said. He also expressed an interest in the Marine Corps, demolitions and becoming a criminal profiler, according to the court documents.

Claire City has only 85 residents and there are only about 2,500 people living in the area around Sisseton, which is in northeast South Dakota, near the state’s borders with North Dakota and Minnesota.

Kirk Snaza, a youth director at the Christian Outreach Center in Sisseton, said he drove a school bus for a while and occasionally picked up Hansen, who he described as a quiet loner.

Amanda Ostby, a 24-year-old hairdresser at Little Shop for Hair in Claire City, said she was shocked by the arrest.

“He was a nice kid, well mannered,” said Ostby. “He was a super nice kid so it’s pretty unbelievable.”

“They are a very, very nice family.”

Sisseton School Superintendent Stephen Schulte said counselors have been made available to students.

“We’re dealing with this the best we can,” he said by phone Wednesday.

Follow Yahoo! News on , become a fan on

Police: SD teen wanted to be ‘infamous sociopath’ (AP)

Police: SD teen wanted to be ‘infamous sociopath’ (AP)

September 1st, 2010 By Categories: Education, Florida, Laws, News
SIOUX FALLS, S.D. — Cancer has ravaged several of Ann Aberson’s relatives, so she doesn’t have a problem with her two teenage daughters wearing bracelets to raise awareness of breast cancer.

But their school principal does.

This week, Baltic High School, just north of here, became one of the latest across the USA to ban the rubber bracelets that has a message some say is in poor taste: “I love boobies.”

The bracelets have caused controversy in schools in states including California, Colorado, Idaho, Florida and Wisconsin. Some districts allow students to wear them inside-out, and others ban them.

“When we had an assembly the first day of school, I basically told the students we are not insensitive to the cause,” Baltic High Principal Jim Aisenbrey says. “I think everybody in the gym, including myself, has had a family member or relative or friend who has dealt with the issue. I do think there are more proper ways to bring this plight to the attention of people, and I don’t think this is a proper way.”

“I guess I never thought of them as offensive,” Aberson says. Her grandmother and five of her grandmother’s sisters battled breast cancer.

The bracelets, which sell for about $4 in stores, were created by Keep A Breast Foundation, a Carlsbad, Calif., non-profit group that seeks to increase breast cancer awareness among young people. Proceeds from sales support the foundation’s programs, founder Shaney Jo Darden says. She says the bracelets are meant to spark discussions.

“That’s the whole idea, it’s getting people to talk about breast cancer, it’s getting people to share their feelings about how this disease has impacted their life,” she says. “The bracelet is doing what it’s meant to do — it’s making people talk.”

“Schools banning it? That’s crazy,” says Julie Hubbell of Lewisville, Texas. Hubbell helped organize an auction and barbeque named “Boobie Q” to raise money for the Susan G. Komen Foundation, which fights breast cancer.

In the Fresno, Calif., area, students in the Clovis Unified School District were told not to wear the bracelets in class — or to turn them inside out so the message is not visible, spokeswoman Kelly Avants says. The district’s dress code outlaws jewelry with sexually suggestive language or images, she says.

Schools ban bracelets promoting cancer awareness

Schools ban bracelets promoting cancer awareness